The Supreme Court on Monday added two new cases to its docket for the 2025-26 term, both involving efforts to litigate disputes in federal rather than state courts. In a […]

Arizona v. United States has been consistently applied for over a decade, but the current administration's methods may not fit the 'spirit' of the decision.

Over the next few weeks, the Supreme Court will release its final opinions of the term, including a decision that could help define the extent of President Donald Trump’s executive authority.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is in the homestretch of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump administration’s emergency appeals of lower court orders seeking to slow President Donald Trump’s efforts to remake the federal government.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court issued six decisions, including four unanimous rulings. In A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Soto v. United States, Martin v. United States, and Rivers v. Guerrero, all nine justices reached the same conclusion.

A recent Supreme Court decision in May 2025 could redefine constitutional principles and federal governance. While seemingly technical, its implications are vast, questioning presidential power and federal agency independence.

Richard Glossip has endured one of the most troubled and complicated death penalty cases in American history. It seemed to be over when, last February, the United States Supreme Court struck down his conviction.

The justices agreed to review an appeal brought by the conservative Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom. It's not the only one for next term.