All the above referred criminal revision applications are directed against the same impugned order dated 13-8-1998 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur whereby non-applicants/accused S.M.

From the above referred observations, it is evident that theterm ‘interlocutory order’ used in sub section 2 of Section 397 of Cr.P.C. covers the challenge made to the orders for bail. {Para 17} This ...

11. Reverting back to S.R. Sukumar (supra), it does not follow from the judgment that post-cognizance, no amendment can be allowed. In fact, a reading of the penultimate paragraph of the judgment ...

The guidelines framed by the High Court of Allahabad in the impugned judgment dated 13.06.2022 in Criminal Revision No. 1126 of 2022 vide paras 32 to 38, with regard to ‘Constitution of Family Welfare ...

The COSCO Shipping case demonstrates that courts are increasingly willing to accept forensic analysis of digital ...

In this position, it has to be concluded that even for the offence under the POCSO Act the Magistrate is not barred to take cognizance and by the enabling provision, the Special Court is also ...

Bombay HC: Under which circumstances, the court can release accused involved in vehicular accident prosecuted for an offence U/S 304 of IPC on bail?

Kerala HC: What conditions the court should impose for releasing accused found in possession of intermediate quantity of contraband?

Kerala HC: What conditions the court should impose while releasing accused on Anticipatory bail?

· Whether the police, during the investigation of a criminal case, can freeze the bank account of a third-party company (Headstar Global Pvt. Ltd.) under Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha ...

Bombay HC: Whether the court should allow anticipatory bail application in case of seizure of Gutka or Pan Masala?